← All findings

Meteorites

Negative Control

Second negative control. Meteorites don't trigger each other — and our method agrees.

Decision Chain: Meteorites

Step 1Raw Data Ingestion

Ingest Meteoritical Bulletin meteorite fall records. Witnessed meteorite falls with recorded dates.

Meteorite fall records ingested.

Step 2Hawkes Process Decomposition

Fit self-exciting point process. Meteorite falls are random events — one meteorite cannot trigger another.

Branching ratio 0.005. Near-zero self-excitation, as expected for random physical events.

Step 3Cross-Validation with Fireballs

Compare with the fireball negative control (era-corrected BR 0.007). Two independent datasets both show near-zero.

Meteorites (0.005) and fireballs (0.007) independently confirm: the method does not hallucinate self-excitation.

Second negative control: PASSED

Meteorite falls are genuinely random — one meteorite entering Earth's atmosphere cannot trigger another. The branching ratio of 0.005 is effectively zero, confirming that our Hawkes process does not produce false positive self-excitation. Combined with fireballs (0.007), we now have two independent negative controls. When we report high branching ratios for datasets like NUFORC (0.959) or BFRO (0.988), we can be confident that's real contagion, not a method artifact.