Project Aletheia
Consciousness, cold cases, and the questions science left untouched. All of it made testable.
Independent research lab
Aletheia is an independent research lab. It takes hard questions about reality that supposedly can’t be answered and it makes them testable.
NASA/JPL confirmed and fixed eight records in its close-approach database after this lab reported them. Google DeepMind confirmed and merged a fix to its Formal Conjectures mathematics library. Every finding here carries its evidence and its limits and the exact test that could kill it.
Every question runs through the same machine. Basanos is that machine. Rules get locked before any data is read and verdicts come from code with no AI in the scoring path and every detector has to catch planted fake answers before it touches anything real. How Basanos works →
These are lifecycle counts from the reconciled public catalog. A supported finding passed its evidence checks; a discovery also needs verified novelty.
When a question dies interesting
Not every question ends in an answer. Some die on a defect and some run out of data and some just stall. Aletheia publishes those too. Each cold case says what was found and how it died and the exact dataset or file or expert read that would reopen it. One reply with the right data can restart a case.
See the open cases →Everything enters as sources with provenance. Each dataset gets honest limits, each test gets its rules locked before the data is read, verdicts come from code with no AI in the scoring path, and every detector proves itself on planted answers first. What survives is published with its receipts. What dies interesting stays open as a cold case. The ledger grows either way.
Honest disposition is the credibility signal. These rules hold for every result the platform publishes.
A failed prediction remains in the findings ledger as a bounded null instead of disappearing.
An interesting pattern can stay available for follow-up without receiving claim authority.
The Hessdalen claim is about observation ecology under matched controls. It is not a physical explanation of the lights.
A supported finding is not called a discovery until a dated prior-art review permits it.
These outcomes clear the evidence gate. Each one is bounded by the data and the controls that produced it and none of them is a universal claim. Showing 6 of 14.
In the full-date Hessdalen event corpus, dated observations behave as an observation-ecology result rather than a physical explanation: event days are not elevated on same-day Kp against matched +/-7/14/21/28 day controls, while precipitation and wind-gust metrics are lower than controls. This claim does not explain what the Hessdalen lights are, does not claim weather causes the phenomenon, and does not refute geomagnetic hypotheses generally; it only says same-day Kp is not elevated in this bridge. Weather evidence is Open-Meteo reanalysis-grid data, not direct station instrument logs for every event.
In two raw psychedelic-EEG datasets (ketamine and DMT), apparent increases in signal-diversity complexity (Lempel-Ziv) are largely explained by flattening of the 1/f aperiodic slope; after controlling for the aperiodic exponent, no separable complexity effect remains in these datasets.
Closed-set pseudonymous linkage within DreamBank after obvious content clues were removed.
Validated markers in 2,192 OBERF narratives follow a coarse order in the telling: onset/body markers early, tunnel and light mid-narrative, felt presence after them, return-to-body last; p=1e-4 in both corpus halves under an event-set-preserving null. Early-cluster internal order is not stable, so the supported claim is a coarse gradient, not a step-by-step sequence.
In the public 128-study ganzfeld compilation: pooled excess +376.2 hits over the ~5,459-trial chance expectation (p<1e-5), robust to greedy removal of 46 of 128 studies; decline over time absent at the frozen 0.01 threshold; small-study association suggestive only (p=0.019-0.047). Structure of the compiled file; upstream selection untested; no psi conclusion either way.
All nine frozen machine cases for the seven-vertex rainbow-stacking problem are closed as unsatisfiable. Six have direct checked certificates. Three have checked symmetry-reduced certificates plus a reviewed transfer argument. This is a conditional resolution pending human review of the encoding and mathematical reductions.
Aletheia works on contested questions across several fields. The method is the same in all of them.
Fields where selection bias and wishful thinking usually win, and public records nobody has audited.
Nothing on this list is specific to anomalies. It ports to any contested evidence domain.
The corpus is the stress test. The method is the product.
Methods, controls, null results, and the evidence trail behind every finding.
Read the methods →What the lab is and what it has corrected and how every result is gated.
About the lab →Open-source website: public lifecycle catalog, provenance links, and validation gates.
View on GitHub →Findings, questions, tests, and failures stay separate by design. Have a dataset or replication target? Send it for review.